VIII.5: More Objections to Judicial Review

Share this page

More Objections to Judicial Review

Many American and British leaders have expressed objections to judicial review:

Andrew Jackson clearly had his objections to judicial review:

[T]he Supreme Court … ought not to control the coordinate authorities of this government. The Congress, the Executive, and the Court must, each for itself, be guided by its own opinion of the Constitution. (Jackson 1832)

Abraham Lincoln said America’s government was “of the people, by the people, for the people”. (Lincoln 1863) And he believed judicial review would destroy that idea:

[I]f the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, … the people will have ceased, to be their own rulers … (Lincoln 1861)

Jeremy Bentham, an British philosopher, jurist, and social reformer, agreed:

The power of repealing a law even for reasons given is a great power: too great indeed for Judges …. (Bentham [1776] 1891, IV.33)

Today, many believe that the majority of the writers of the U.S. Constitution did not intend to give the courts the power of judicial review.

For example:

When legislative sovereignty is recognized, along with the nature of checks and balance, and analytical errors are removed, it becomes clear why the Constitution does not give the Supreme Court the general power of judicial review of the acts of the coordinate branches; the reason is that judicial power was intended to be impartial and not involved in policy.

… We have powerful evidence … that an extraordinary majority at the convention refused to allow the Court to be associated with the executive in the council of revision or to be brought into the legislating process …. We may not assume, without express evidence, that a majority that rejected this role for the Court would have intended that the Court have, instead, a general power of judicial review of the acts of the national branches. (Anderson 1986, 154-5)

Many objections to judicial review follow the belief that the courts were meant as an agent of stability, while judicial review makes them an agent of social change.

That is, the agent of social change was supposed to be, not the courts, but the people through the election process. Has judicial lawmaking replaced the purpose of representatives? (Walker 1981, 137)

The Constitution’s framers gave the executive and legislative branches the responsibility for determining policy. However, Judicial review often prevents them from assuming that responsibility. (Ceaser 1986, 191)

Clearly justices and judges are far better trained in law than anyone. However, they have little understanding of what the millions of citizens think the Constitution’s words mean. So, our desire to fill our courts with professional judges trained in law leads to a loss of such understanding. That is, professional lawyers have not had the opportunity to be exposed to the non-legal jobs held by other citizens. So, a “professional judiciary” is detached “from those it passes judgment upon”. (Barber 2001, 75)

Judges and justices obviously understand law far better than the rest of us. But do they understand how law, especially their interpretation of it, affects the rest of us? Most importantly, do they interpret its words the same way you would?

This site is for discussing how to improve our political system. It is NOT for discussing party politics or political figures. So if you have a non-partisan question or comment, feel free to leave it below.

To top of page

Next post

Sources:

Anderson, Ann Stuart. 1986. “A 1787 Perspective on Separation of Powers”. In Separation of powers—does it still work? ed. Robert A. Goldwin and William A. Schambra. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

Barber, N. W. 2001. “Prelude to the Separation of Powers”. In The Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 60, No. 1 (Mar.), pp. 59-88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4508751.

Bentham, Jeremy. [1776] 1891. A Fragment on Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ceaser, James W. 1986. “In Defense of Separation of Powers”. In Separation of powers—does it still work?, ed. Robert A. Goldwin and William A. Schambra. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

Jackson, Andrew. 1832. Veto Message on Jul. 10. University of Chicago Press. http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a1_8_18s20.html (Accessed Jun. 28, 2018).

Lincoln, Abraham. 1861. First Inaugural Address on Mar. 4. UShistory.org. www.ushistory.org/documents/lincoln1.htm (Accessed Jun. 28, 2018).

Lincoln, Abraham. 1863. Gettysburg Address. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettysburg_Address (Accessed Jul. 9, 2020)

Walker, David B. 1981. Toward a Functioning Federalism. United States: Winthrop Publishers, Inc.

37 thoughts on “VIII.5: More Objections to Judicial Review”

  1. I have learn some excellent stuff here. Definitely price bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how so much effort you set to make any such fantastic informative website.

    Reply
  2. I was extremely pleased to uncover this site. I want to to thank you for
    ones time just for this fantastic read!! I definitely really liked
    every little bit of it and i also have you book marked to see new stuff on your site.

    Reply
  3. Hey there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any problems with hackers?
    My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing months of hard work due to no backup.

    Do you have any methods to stop hackers?

    Reply
  4. Interesting blog! Is your theme custom made or did you
    download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple tweeks
    would really make my blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your design. Cheers

    Reply
  5. I wanted to send you one tiny note to give many thanks once again relating to the breathtaking information you have contributed on this page. This has been so particularly generous of you to allow easily all that many of us could have marketed as an electronic book to end up making some money for themselves, precisely considering the fact that you could possibly have done it in case you considered necessary. The pointers likewise worked like a easy way to fully grasp that other individuals have similar interest really like my personal own to figure out a lot more with respect to this condition. I’m sure there are some more pleasurable situations ahead for many who discover your site. boostaro reviews

    Reply
  6. I needed to write you one very little note so as to thank you very much the moment again with your pleasant solutions you have discussed in this case. It’s really seriously generous of you to present freely what exactly many people might have sold for an electronic book to end up making some bucks for their own end, most notably since you might have done it in case you considered necessary. These tricks also acted as the easy way to know that some people have the identical zeal really like my personal own to know the truth more on the subject of this issue. I am sure there are numerous more enjoyable periods up front for individuals who view your blog. lottery defeated reviews

    Reply
  7. Needed to create you a little observation in order to say thank you yet again for these breathtaking views you have discussed at this time. It is generous of people like you to offer easily precisely what many individuals would have marketed as an e book to help with making some dough for themselves, and in particular since you could possibly have tried it in the event you considered necessary. Those techniques in addition worked like the great way to be sure that the rest have the identical eagerness the same as my own to know the truth lots more pertaining to this issue. I am sure there are millions of more fun moments ahead for many who start reading your blog. smart hemp gummies

    Reply
  8. Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up and
    let you know a few of the images aren’t loading properly.
    I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue.

    I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both show the same results.

    Reply
  9. Hello! I know this is kinda off topic however , I’d figured I’d ask.
    Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest writing a
    blog post or vice-versa? My blog discusses a lot of the same topics as yours and I think we could greatly benefit from
    each other. If you happen to be interested feel free to shoot
    me an e-mail. I look forward to hearing from
    you! Excellent blog by the way!

    Take a look at my web-site – how to use provadent

    Reply
  10. Undeniably imagine that that you said. Your favorite reason seemed to
    be on the internet the simplest factor to take into accout of.
    I say to you, I certainly get annoyed even as
    other folks think about concerns that they just do not recognize about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the highest as neatly as
    defined out the entire thing without having side effect , folks can take a signal.
    Will probably be back to get more. Thank you

    Also visit my web site; the billionaire brain wave program

    Reply
  11. I think this is one of the most significant info for me.

    And i’m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on some general things, The site style is perfect,
    the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

    my page … UltraK9 Pro

    Reply
  12. Hey! I know this is kinda off topic however I’d figured I’d ask.
    Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest authoring a blog
    post or vice-versa? My website discusses a lot of the same subjects as yours
    and I think we could greatly benefit from each other. If you’re interested feel
    free to send me an e-mail. I look forward to hearing from you!
    Excellent blog by the way!

    my web-site; the billionaire brain wave

    Reply
  13. Howdy this is somewhat of off topic but I was wondering
    if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML.
    I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding expertise so I wanted
    to get advice from someone with experience.

    Any help would be enormously appreciated!

    Look at my web blog … lung clear pro scam

    Reply
  14. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally,
    it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.

    You obviously know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you
    could be giving us something enlightening to read?

    Feel free to surf to my site – prodentim review scam

    Reply
  15. An outstanding share! I have just forwarded this onto
    a coworker who was conducting a little research on this.
    And he in fact bought me breakfast simply because I found it for him…
    lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!!
    But yeah, thanks for spending time to talk about this
    subject here on your website.

    my homepage :: phenq coupon 2018

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Verified by MonsterInsights